Spencer Pratt recently ran a daring campaign for mayor, taking on the current Mayor Karen Bass and socialist Democrat Nitya Raman, though he ultimately lost to Raman, a member of the Democratic Socialists of America.
Once mainly recognized as a reality TV star, Pratt attracted attention from many Angelenos who feel neglected and frightened by escalating crime rates. His campaign surprised some, especially as he seemed to close in on a general election win.
Even though Pratt is out of the race, he’s not stepping away from the political scene.
In his first in-depth interview since the contentious mail-in ballot count in the November runoff, Pratt expressed a commitment to fighting for the city he loves.
While he criticized California’s voting system, he also felt gratitude for the backing he received.
In his reflections on the election, he mentioned feeling “energized.” Pratt stated that many people have lost faith in the voting system, which he finds flawed. “It’s tough to see so many feeling demoralized,” he added.
When asked if he viewed the election as fair, he pointed out the potential for wrongdoing, emphasizing that while there’s evidence, it shouldn’t be mistaken for proof. Regardless, he concurred that the voting system inspires little trust. He highlighted concerns over the universal mail-in voting, expressing that the process lacks sufficient safeguards against fraud.
Pratt believes changes are necessary, noting the Supreme Court might soon rule against the collection of ballots after Election Day. He argued that by eliminating mail-in voting in favor of secure phone voting, transparency could increase significantly.
Reflecting on his campaign strategy, he shared that he faced stiff competition, referencing Adam Miller, who, despite his resources and experience, couldn’t secure much support. “It’s remarkable to think I garnered over 200,000 votes in a city so deeply blue,” he said, recognizing the media’s tendency to favor established candidates.
Addressing the personal aspects of the campaign, Pratt admitted that he’s had an unexpected number of votes, which feels surreal for someone previously known more for reality TV than political prowess.
Pratt noted that the residents’ anger stems from a perception that Los Angeles has been significantly impacted by poor leadership from socialist policies. He believes his campaign resonated because he aimed to reverse those changes.
Despite potential familiarity with him before the election, he doesn’t fret much about his image. Instead, he’s focused on making sure that people recognize the pitfalls of socialist governance.
Looking ahead, he is adamant about remaining vocal against what he sees as corrupt political practices. “I’m not going anywhere,” he declared.
Pratt expressed his love for Los Angeles, noting its rich history and culinary scene but lamented the influence of socialist governance on the city’s cultural landscape.
He also observed that many might feel hesitant to voice their opinions due to fear of repercussions on their careers. This atmosphere of intimidation, he thinks, stifles genuine dialogue and, ultimately, the city’s well-being.
His message to the people of LA and California? “Stop the socialists before they finish you off.”
