Changes in the Pro-Life Movement After Roe vs. Wade
The anticipated triumph for the pro-life movement following the overturning of Roe vs. Wade has not unfolded as expected. Instead of seeing a decline in abortion, there’s been an increase in the availability of abortion pills and a rise in abortion rates.
In a recent discussion, Blaze TV host Steve Deace shared his thoughts on the current state of the pro-life movement, pointing out that there’s a significant conversation happening, but many feel stuck. He emphasized that since the regime change, substantial progress hasn’t been made in this movement.
Deace noted that abortion pills are now easily accessible nationwide, hinting at systemic issues within the movement that need to be addressed. He mentioned that while they celebrated a regulatory victory (or “D-Day”), the overall battle appears to have been lost.
According to him, one of the primary reasons for stagnation in the pro-life movement is the “deep divisions” over specific tactics and abolition, which some label as “equal protection.” He referenced his friend Seth Gruber, who argues that accountability for murder should apply universally, including in cases of abortion. Yet, mainstream pro-life advocates largely oppose this view, fearing that it may harm their political viability.
Deace expressed skepticism about the sincerity of mainstream pro-life leaders, suggesting that many don’t genuinely believe in their advocacy. He reflected on the challenges women face today, drawing a parallel to his mother’s struggles decades ago when she was confronted with the reality of fetal imaging.
Despite the challenges, Deace emphasized the necessity of making political calculations. He suggested a strategy of advocating for an extensive ban on abortions, even if it includes exceptions. This, he believes, is a way to confront what he sees as false opposition in the debate.
He provocatively asked whether doctors would support such a deal, claiming that their reluctance stems from a desire to continue performing abortions, which he characterized plainly.
