On Tuesday’s “CNN News Central” broadcast, Biden 2024 co-chair Sen. Chris Coons (D-Delaware) said border crossings were more frequent in 2017 under then-President Donald Trump than in previous years. answered the argument that there were far fewer. They still do that even though immigration law says nothing has actually changed, one provision is family separation and another has been struck down in court. .
“Many of my colleagues say Joe Biden could always fix it, no, he can’t,” Coons said. “This bill includes emergency powers that Donald Trump sought when he was president. That’s what President Joe Biden also called for in his first State of the Union. We need to change our laws and provide resources. This bill includes more deportations, expanded asylum hearings, and more Border Patrol agents. As a reminder, the head of the Border Patrol union is one of the most conservative people I’ve ever met…He supports this deal and supports the border They claimed it would be safer and more secure, and yet Republicans are walking away.”
Co-host Boris Sanchez then said, “I want to focus on the objections you mentioned from Mr. Trump and other Republicans about what’s in the bill. They argue that if the law is followed, the current crisis at the border will be alleviated. say that not much has actually changed. They argue that what has changed is the executive branch, and specifically who is in the White House. Obviously, in 2017, it is It was Donald Trump. What is your answer to that?”
“My response is that one of the steps that Donald Trump took was cruel and condemned by everyone here, Republicans and Democrats, to stop families from coming to the border,” Coons said. In order to do so, parents and children were intentionally separated.” One of his other actions was ruled invalid and illegal by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, which covers California and Arizona, which make up most of the border. This is one area where a bipartisan group that has been negotiating with President Biden for months is seeking to give the president emergency powers. That would be in the interest of President Biden or any future president.fact [that] The fact that they are walking away from there shows how insincere they are. ”
to follow Ian Hanchett’s Twitter @Ian Hanchett
