SELECT LANGUAGE BELOW

White House criticizes New Yorker writer for belittling the sacrifice of National Guard members

White House criticizes New Yorker writer for belittling the sacrifice of National Guard members

Two National Guardsmen were on patrol in West Virginia’s capital when, the day before Thanksgiving, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem reportedly fatally shot a 29-year-old Afghan national. It was mentioned that this individual had, under the Biden administration, been part of a group released on mass parole in the U.S. without thorough vetting as part of Operation Welcoming Allies back in September 2021.

Meanwhile, a 24-year-old U.S. Air Force Staff Sergeant, Sarah Beckstrom, eventually lost her battle for survival on Thursday night after being critically wounded. Her father expressed immense pride and sorrow, stating, “My baby girl has earned glory,” in a heartfelt social media post. “…This was a terrible tragedy.”

As people began to share their condolences and support for the victims and their families, Jane Mayer, a Washington correspondent for The New Yorker, faced backlash for diminishing the sacrifices of military members. She remarked, “This is extremely tragic and unnecessary, and these poor security guards should never have been in place.” Her observation about their role in D.C.—simply picking up trash—felt dismissive to many, and her comments did not sit well with the public or the White House.

In response to Mayer’s remarks, White House communications director Stephen Chan advised her to refrain from politicizing the matter, saying, “They were trying to protect Washington, D.C., and make the nation’s capital safer.” He emphasized that someone who commits brutal acts forfeits any trust.

A significant amount of outrage targeted Mayer from various quarters. White House rapid response accounts condemned liberal journalists for their attitudes towards these tragic events. One account went so far as to call them “disgusting, disgusting ghouls,” highlighting the heroism of the guardsmen who had saved many lives.

Interestingly, after President Trump had federalized the D.C. Metropolitan Police Department and deployed the National Guard to restore order, there was a notable drop in crime rates, including a 44% decline in violent crime during the initial weeks of the new anti-crime initiative.

Some members of Congress and others echoed similar sentiments, condemning the left’s response to the situation. Georgia Congressman Mike Collins insisted, “Apologise and repent,” urging a stop to the blame directed at American soldiers.

In the midst of this controversy, some critics pointed out instances where National Guardsmen had acted heroically. For instance, a reporter recounted a scenario where two guardsmen had prevented a potential suicide on subway tracks, underlining their life-saving capabilities. Others voiced their appreciation for the National Guard’s presence in making D.C. safer, arguing that many lives had been spared.

When challenged, Mayer stated her experience covering crime since 1981 and suggested that the statistics can be manipulated, asserting that murders had been decreasing even before the military’s arrival. This back-and-forth further highlighted the complexities of the ongoing debate around safety, politics, and the sacrifices made by military personnel.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Reddit
Telegram
WhatsApp

Related News