Trial of Ryan Rouse over Attempted Assassination of Trump

Ryan Rouse, the individual charged with attempting to assassinate Donald Trump last year at a Florida golf course, announced on Monday that he would not appear in his own criminal case.

Rouse, 59, is representing himself in federal court. He has explicitly denied committing any crimes related to the accusations of trying to kill a presidential candidate, attacking a federal officer, and attempting to acquire a firearm. Should he be found guilty, he faces a possible life sentence.

He had previously suggested he might testify, a risky choice that would waive his right against self-incrimination, leaving him open to questioning from federal prosecutors.

During a Monday morning session, Judge Irene Cannon questioned Rouse on whether he had adequately considered his choices and if he wanted to speak with a standby attorney. Rouse remained firm in his decision. The prosecution, meanwhile, was deliberating whether to present further witnesses before taking a lunch break.

If no additional witnesses are called, the defense is set to conclude its case within a few hours, potentially paving the way for closing arguments and jury deliberation.

FBI Testimony Continues in Trump’s Case

Rouse began his defense by calling Michael McClay, a firearms expert, as his only witness, followed by some family friends and past colleagues.

McClay, who has expertise in sniper tactics and firearms, confirmed that he was brought in to testify but expressed reluctance to advocate for Rouse. During questioning, Rouse focused heavily on the SKS rifle in question, even questioning its ability to hit a target 375 yards away.

McClay responded that it would rely on the shooter’s proficiency but confirmed that the rifle could indeed strike a target at that distance.

On cross-examination, prosecutors inquired if the rifle could inflict harm on a person at that range, to which McClay affirmed it could. Rouse then asked McClay whether he thought the alleged sniper would have had a backup plan should the attempt fail.

Witness Lists and Evidence in Rouse’s Trial

Rouse’s roster of witnesses was notably minimal compared to the multitude of witnesses presented by the prosecution, which included forensic specialists, FBI agents, and Secret Service personnel.

His list comprised only McClay, family friend Atwill Milsun, and former colleague Marshall Hinshaw. These witnesses provided slim insights due to their personal ties to Rouse.

It’s important to note that Rouse had not planned to present any evidence on his behalf, as previous court submissions were rejected. Prosecutors dismissed these exhibits as irrelevant, including childhood drawings and notes.

Last week, Judge Cannon stated that she would allow Rouse to maintain his exhibits in the court record, should he choose to challenge her ruling.

In stark contrast to Rouse’s minimal approach, the prosecution has amassed considerable evidence and a thorough witness list, including over 38 testimonies and numerous exhibits comprising text messages and surveillance footage.

According to an FBI representative, Rouse’s DNA was located on various items found in a “sniper’s nest” situated near the sixth hole.

The government’s final witness, special agent Kimberly McGreevy, testified that extensive mobile phone data, surveillance footage, and license plate records indicated movements associated with Trump leading up to the alleged assassination attempt.