SELECT LANGUAGE BELOW

Ben Shapiro claims Trump’s effort for a $230M DOJ payout is full of conflicts of interest

Ben Shapiro says Trump’s $230M DOJ payout push is ‘rife with conflicts of interest’

On Saturday, conservative commentator Ben Shapiro voiced his disapproval of President Trump’s move to secure a $230 million payout from the Department of Justice (DOJ) in connection with various federal investigations into his actions.

Shapiro remarked, “I think conflicts of interest are rampant.” He expressed concern about potential legal repercussions, stating, “I can’t imagine a world where things don’t end with a huge number of lawsuits or even an impeachment in the House of Representatives. That’s just a bad strategy.”

President Trump has claimed that earlier DOJ probes into his conduct were “politically motivated” and had negatively affected his reputation.

Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, a former personal attorney for Trump, is one of those who will decide on the settlement. Trump has indicated that he would donate the funds to charity.

Shapiro criticized the situation, saying, “Pretending it’s not a conflict of interest, but for the president to ask his Justice Department appointee to sign a check for $230 million, even if it goes to charity, clearly creates a serious conflict of interest that I think is impossible to avoid in any legal context.”

Others in Congress, particularly Republican senators, have expressed significant concerns about this initiative.

Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) commented on the timing, noting, “It’s terrible timing, at least considering we’re in a government shutdown,” adding that there are substantial optics-related worries but uncertain precedents regarding such matters.

Tillis urged DOJ officials to maintain proper protocols in their handling of funds intended for Trump. “If there’s a precedent, that’s the beginning of the discussion. If there is no precedent for this kind of thing, I don’t think now is the time to establish it,” he said.

Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) weighed in, describing the effort as “very irregular.”

House Democrats have announced intentions to probe Trump’s claim for damages, labeling it a “clearly illegal and unconstitutional effort to steal $230 million from the American people.”

Democratic Representatives Jamie Raskin (Md.) and Robert Garcia (Calif.) sent a letter to Trump, criticizing the poor timing of his request. They stated, “You waited until you became president, installed hand-picked allies in the Department of Justice knowing that you could secretly direct them to jointly sign a demand letter behind closed doors, and then submit that demand letter to the U.S. Treasury for cold hard cash courtesy of the American taxpayer.”

In their closing remarks, they asserted, “It’s not justice, it’s theft.”

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Reddit
Telegram
WhatsApp

Related News