Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Florida) said Tuesday that we need an industrial policy that promotes the domestic industrial base to the benefit of the working class while combating globalism and Communist China’s economic penetration. outlined in the speech. washington post editorial.
Mr. Rubio’s call to action is a counterpoint to the Biden administration’s economic policies. believe It relies on “spending huge sums of money on dubious projects and possibly empowering Communist China in the process.”
The United States previously had an industrial policy that encouraged the creation of industrialization that benefited both American workers and American businesses. Over time, Rubio argued, global elites have eroded policies that increase profit margins at the expense of American workers.
But around the time the Berlin Wall came down, Washington and Wall Street elites created a one-sided narrative that free enterprise accomplished everything. And they subsequently ignored policy measures to support our great manufacturers in the private sector. Thirty years later, it’s clear they were wrong.
The number of U.S. aerospace and defense general contractors has declined. 51:00 to 5:00. The situation is even worse for small defense manufacturers and machine shops.our submarine fleet is shrinking at a certain rate Manufacturers cannot compensate.and we dependent on china Used in many key components of munitions and military semiconductors.
On the other hand, the hollowing out of industry brought great chaos to American society. The working class has traded relative prosperity and social stability for downward mobility and political instability. Marriage, childbirth, and labor force participation rates are declining. Loneliness, drug addiction and suicide are on the rise.
By contrast, Mr. Rubio’s industrial plan represents the flipside of U.S. immigration policy that prioritizes “importing cheap labor” that pushes down the wages of American workers while promoting free trade theories.
Rubio wrote that U.S. industrial policy will prioritize:
- It focuses on the working class “rather than fantasies such as a ‘green transition'”.
- Supporting America’s mining, oil and gas, and metallurgy industries
- Tying generous subsidies to performance requirements such as “export quotas”
- Deregulation and “reform” of the business environment
In 2023, Rubio published a book that further delves into his vision for the American economy. He argued that the federal government’s immigration policy is driven by business and economics, not claims about “citizens of the world.”
Today, our immigration system is corrupt and exploitative across this country. And it started, like many of America’s problems, with a fundamental shift to a globalized economy.
…
However, not all companies can export. In other words, Wall Street simply figured out how to import cheap labor. much of it [clarification, not all] It comes from illegal immigrants. This was a slower, more delicate process. Sure, some politicians have made a big deal about “jobs Americans don’t want to do,” but other than that, wages stagnate and benefits stagnate until they are replaced by people willing to work more hours. The only protest came from workers who felt that their welfare benefits and working hours were being cut. Cheaper.
Often it’s about jobs that Wall Street doesn’t want Americans to do. Because hiring Americans requires higher wages and better working conditions. It is better for them to import cheap labor and buy off Americans with government-provided cash welfare programs.
Another aspect of U.S. industrial policy could include tariffs, which former President Donald Trump supports. The issue of tariffs is one of the longest-running debates in US history. Tariffs generate revenue for the federal government and encourage domestic production in some industries by acting as a protective barrier against foreign competitors.
A JL Partners/DailyMail.com poll recently found that a majority of voters support the U.S. imposing a 10% tariff on all imports.
A 10% tariff is a historically low tax rate.average price increased According to Douglas A. Irwin’s Trade Policy in American Economic History, it rose to 60 percent between 1790 and 1860, but then fell to 20 percent. From 1861 to 1933, the average tariff increased to 50%. Since 1934, the rise of an idea called “free trade” has lowered tariffs to an average of about 5%.
Free trade sidelined tariffs in policy discussions until 2016, when President Trump campaigned on an America First policy that protects American producers. Some economists believe that “free trade” is a radical idea born to benefit the world’s elites.
Wendell Husebo is a political reporter for Breitbart News and a former Republican war room analyst.he is the author of politics of slave morality.Follow Wendell “X” @WendellHusebø or society of truth @WendellHusebo.
