Strategist Advises Arizona Democrats to Shift Approach
James Carville, an experienced Democratic campaign strategist, recently suggested to the new chairman of Arizona’s Democratic Party that he should consider “silencing” dissent and perhaps even forming a new progressive party.
Democrats are currently facing challenges in redefining their identity post-election. There’s an ongoing debate among party leaders about whether to ease off or double down on their left and right identity politics.
Carville, known for criticizing progressive elements within the party, pointed out that Democrats are actually performing impressively in Arizona—a state often seen as red—given that there’s a Democratic governor and two Democratic senators currently in office.
Nevertheless, he cautioned that extreme left-wing politics and aggressive combat strategies could jeopardize this opportunity.
In a recent New York Times article, which discussed internal party conflicts, it was highlighted that Arizona Democratic Chairman Robert Branscombe had accused Carville of creating clashes over personnel decisions while also not sharing financial documents.
The article also mentioned Branscombe’s concerns about Senators Reuben Gallego and Mark Kelly criticizing some of his staffing choices.
Carville endorsed both senators but bluntly told Branscombe, “You’re not elected to be a spokesperson. So why don’t you just keep quiet?”
He elaborated in a video on the Politicon YouTube channel, expressing frustration with members emerging from what he termed “progressive” backgrounds in states lacking strong Democratic leadership. “We finally have a Democratic governor, and yet they’re at odds with him,” he noted.
Carville highlighted a broader issue he sees happening, referencing a similar situation in Nevada, calling it “one of the most successful states in American history.”
He questioned why party members, who aren’t elected officials, should continue to speak out against the party’s direction, asking rhetorically, “Shouldn’t we just keep quiet and focus on those actively winning elections?”
Carville argued that there is a fundamental issue at hand and even suggested that those in the progressive wing of the party should rethink if they truly align with Democratic values. “Maybe it’s time to explore other movements if they’re not committed to winning elections,” he indicated.
In a strong conclusion, Carville insisted that if party members fail to prioritize winning, “then democratic politics is irrelevant to them.”
The Arizona Democratic Party has yet to respond to these statements.
