DOJ Threatens Legal Action Against California’s Energy Policies
The Department of Justice (DOJ) has expressed that it might pursue legal action against California regulators if they move forward with stringent energy efficiency policies aimed at phasing out certain gas appliances.
On Thursday, U.S. Attorney Viral Essayli sent a letter to the South Coast Air Quality Control District (SCAQMD), indicating that the DOJ would intervene should the SCAQMD proceed with a proposed rule. This rule intends to mandate that manufacturers transition 90% of furnace and water heater sales to zero-emission models by 2036. This warning coincides with a presidential order issued by President Trump, which instructs the DOJ to challenge state and local policies that jeopardize domestic energy resources.
In his letter, Essayli stated, “These two SCAQMD policies pose a risk to community safety and could lead to increased energy costs for California families.” He emphasized that the president made it clear he opposes actions that could hinder domestic energy production and affordability. “My office is prepared to contest these misguided proposals and safeguard the interests of the residents,” he added.
Additionally, former President Biden had previously set forth strict energy efficiency regulations covering multiple appliances as part of his broader climate strategy, tightening standards for items such as dishwashers, gas stoves, and water heaters.
According to the letter from Essayli, “To protect American citizens, the Attorney General has been directed to take necessary measures to prevent the enforcement of state and local laws that restrict the use of domestic energy resources.” He affirmed that if the proposed rules progress, his office would be ready to take all necessary actions to enforce federal law, including possibly filing civil lawsuits to pursue all available remedies.
Essayli asserted that, from the DOJ’s perspective, the proposed rules violate the Energy Policy and Conservation Act.
As of now, SCAQMD has not provided any comment regarding this matter.
