Concerns Over Enriched Uranium in Iran
Rafael Mariano Grossi, who heads the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), expressed uncertainty regarding the whereabouts of nearly 900 pounds of enriched uranium in Iran. He noted that it was removed as a precautionary measure ahead of recent military actions targeting Iran’s nuclear facilities.
During a segment on Fox News’ Story with Martha McCallum, Grossi was questioned about the enriched uranium’s location following U.S. strikes on key nuclear sites in Iran, namely Fordou, Natanz, and Isfahan, which occurred on Saturday.
According to Grossi, the Natanz facility experienced considerable damage, particularly in areas where centrifuge operations were taking place. While Isfahan also sustained damage, evaluations on-site had not been conducted due to safety concerns.
McCallum referenced a prior statement indicating that Grossi believed the enriched uranium had been moved to a historic site near Isfahan. Grossi clarified, “I must be precise… we’re the IAEA, so there’s no guessing.” He added that there’s currently no information on the material’s location.
He mentioned conversations with Iranian officials, who have indicated that they are taking appropriate safety measures regarding any movements of materials. Grossi emphasized the need for clarity and stated that resuming verification activities would be vital for everyone involved.
When discussing Vice President JD Vance’s comments on Iran’s uranium enrichment levels, Grossi refrained from delving deeply into the specifics. He acknowledged that while Iran may not have the ability to convert uranium to weapons-grade levels, knowing the status and location of the uranium remains crucial.
Grossi maintained that understanding the total amount of uranium in Iran and other countries is his responsibility, underscoring the importance of impartial oversight regarding Iran’s nuclear program.
In a separate note, Vance suggested that if Iran was unable to convert uranium into nuclear weapons, it indicated a successful mission, a sentiment that Grossi somewhat agreed with from a military perspective. Yet, he reiterated that his primary role is focused on tracking nuclear material, insisting that Iran must disclose and explain all materials it possesses.
