Apparently there are two.”inoperableThe day before the January 6, 2021, protests at the Capitol, pipe bombs were placed in the open near Democratic and Republican Party headquarters in Washington, DC. Official accounts of the bomb plot have been under intense scrutiny in the years since.
First, Blaze News investigative journalist Steve Baker revealed that despite a relentless pursuit by the Biden Justice Department, the so-called passerby who discovered the pipe bomb at the DNC in January happened to be a plainclothes Capitol Police officer. I admitted that it was.
In addition to the police officer’s accidental discovery,
can not be displayed The FBI has so far failed to capture the man, despite both tips, as it plagued then-Vice President-elect Kamala Harris’ Secret Service detail. own the video Knowing the suspect who planted the so-called bomb and its route.
As Baker continues to dig deeper into the mysteries surrounding the pipe bomb plot, the investigative journalist discovers even more troubling signs that something was wrong with the investigation from the beginning, particularly cameras controlled by the U.S. Communist Party. did.
Baker reviewed numerous closed-circuit television video footage made available to him by Representative Barry Loudermilk (R-Ga.) and found that three USCPs were customarily directed at the DNC office building. Surveillance cameras were found to be strangely directed away from the scene. Shortly after an object believed to be explosive was discovered. A third camera appears to have missed its target as well, but footage obtained by Blaze News shows it still managed to capture interesting parts of the so-called bomb disposal.
Surveillance cameras were quickly bypassed, but responding law enforcement agencies apparently used similar techniques to stop train service along nearby railroad tracks and to chase away children wandering around the scene. There was no sense of urgency, Baker noted. Ostensibly everything was at risk of a bomb being realistic and doable.
The first police officer to spot the bomb — just a few hours earlier, there was a bomb-sniffing dog.
reportedly He didn’t find anything interesting, but he seemed unfazed by his discovery.
Baker told Blaze News: “I’ve said before that your response was inadequate, but the actual plainclothes Capitol Police officer walked up to the Metropolitan Police Department vehicle first and was in no hurry at all. ” he said. “If I were a cop and I saw a pipe with a timer on it, I’d run.” [to notify the relevant authorities], you know what i mean? ”
Baker noted that the officers’ pace did not quicken immediately afterward. Rather, the officer is seen wandering over to a Secret Service vehicle associated with Kamala Harris, who was inside the DNC at the time, and issuing a warning without any fanfare. Baker said Harris and the Secret Service managed to finish their lunch before taking action.
“There’s nothing logical about that situation,” Baker said.
The failure to stop the train promptly, the delay in warning pedestrians, and the overall “lazy response” of plainclothes cops, the Metropolitan Police Department, and the Secret Service fueled Baker’s suspicions. It was enough. However, the US Communist Party’s choice of timely video recording may have given it a reason not to take the so-called bomb seriously at the time, perhaps because it was an obvious fake, or because of some other foreknowledge. A further question arose as to whether it was for a reason.
In the end, Baker told Blaze News there was no good reason to repurpose the cameras “other than trying to protect certain types of technology,” but that explanation also doesn’t apply to installing bomb disposal equipment. Apparently not. What was used was neither secret nor unique.
A senior source within the USCP suggested that the diversion of cameras from such an important investigation would necessarily have been at the behest of “command level” officials.
As of Jan. 6, that list of candidates would have included Chief Steven Sund. Sean Gallagher, then acting director of uniform operations. Deputy Chief of Security and Intelligence Operations Yogananda Pittman;
Mr. Baker further shortened the list, leaving only Gallagher or Pittman, as Mr. Sund had previously indicated that he was not informed of the discovery of the DNC pipe bomb and the camera diversion until minutes after it had been carried out.
The timeline of the Jan. 6 protest at the Capitol also suggests that Sund was too busy calling for reinforcements at the time, “but Gallagher and Pittman both said they were unsure of what was going on. “They were the only ones who had actual command. Tell someone to move it away,” Baker said.
Camera number 3173 had been showing the DNC parking lot since at least December 28, 2020, but minutes after a plainclothes USCP officer casually walked up heads-up and panned around the device’s location. He reportedly started zooming in. Police vehicles from the Metropolitan Police Department, and then to the Secret Service. However, shortly after 1:40 p.m., the camera was remotely directed away from the scene and remained in that position until at least midnight.
Another camera, identified by The Epoch Times’ Joe Hanneman, was from the roof of the nearby Fairchild Building, giving a great bird’s-eye view of the scene before the bomb squad allegedly destroyed the device. That camera was also intentionally turned away from the scene at 1:44 p.m., until the initial investigation was completed and the bomb was destroyed.
Asked to speculate, Baker told Blaze News: “I think someone knew that these devices were inert and not a viable device and they didn’t want to put cameras on the scene.” Ta.
Footage from a third camera reviewed by Baker and obtained by Blaze News further shows an attempt to hide the investigation from public view. But unlike his other two cameras, this one captured the telling details of the so-called bomb destruction.
Mr Baker said the camera was “strangely unfocused on the scene, even though you could pan out and see everything”. In fact, from this camera you can actually see the convoy going around to the other side of the car. Build a building and take Kamala Harris away. ”
“At that camera location, you’ll be able to see the entire investigation. You’ll be able to see the robots deploy. You’ll be able to see the bomb squad. And you’ll be able to see them clearing the explosives.” We can do it.’ Then there’s the investigation,” Baker continued. “But all of a sudden, this camera focuses so hard again that you can’t see the actual bomb.”
Nevertheless, the cameras appear to have mistakenly captured footage of the bomb squad’s efforts to destroy the so-called bomb.
“You see the robot suddenly come into the frame on the far left of the screen, and then you see the robot come closer and pick up the bomb,” Baker said.
Baker said the Metropolitan Police Department’s bomb-disposal robot was seen “clumsily” dumping the bomb, suggesting that the person operating the camera had either forgotten about it or “had no idea what was going on in the Capitol at the time.” We suspect that there is a high possibility that he was distracted by the scuffle. Install curbs in place of blast containment boxes.
A so-called bomb can be seen falling apart, apparently due to a “bomb disposal water disruptor” that defuses the explosive from a distance.
Baker said that the bomb’s rapid disintegration without an explosion did not prove it was infeasible. After all, that’s exactly the result water cannons are designed to achieve.
But the footage appears to confirm one of former FBI Special Agent Kyle Serafin’s valid reasons for keeping investigations out of the public eye: protecting sensitive or sensitive technology. This means that the reason for doing so was not satisfied. After all, robotics and water destruction techniques are widely known and taught.
Do you like Blaze News? Avoid censorship and sign up for our newsletter to get articles like this delivered straight to your inbox. Please register here!
